Monday, February 23, 2009

Electric Shock 2


Arc-flash hazards
Approximately 80% of all injuries and fatalities caused by electrical incidents are not caused by electric shock, but by the intense heat, light, and pressure wave (blast) caused by electrical faults. The arc flash in an electrical fault produces the same type of light radiation from which electric welders protect themselves using face shields with dark glass, heavy leather gloves, and full-coverage clothing. The heat produced may cause severe burns, especially on unprotected flesh. The blast produced by vaporizing metallic components can break bones and irreparably damage internal organs. The degree of hazard present at a particular location can be determined by a detailed analysis of the electrical system, and appropriate protection worn if the electrical work must be performed with the electricity on.

Issues affecting lethality
Other issues affecting lethality are frequency, which is an issue in causing cardiac arrest or muscular spasms, and pathway—if the current passes through the chest or head there is an increased chance of death. From a main circuit or power distribution panel the damage is more likely to be internal, leading to cardiac arrest.

The comparison between the dangers of alternating current and direct current has been a subject of debate ever since the War of Currents in the 1880s. DC tends to cause continuous muscular contractions that make the victim hold on to a live conductor, thereby increasing the risk of deep tissue burns. On the other hand, mains-magnitude AC tends to interfere more with the heart's electrical pacemaker, leading to an increased risk of fibrillation. AC at higher frequencies holds a different mixture of hazards, such as RF burns and the possibility of tissue damage with no immediate sensation of pain. Generally, higher frequency AC current tends to run along the skin rather than penetrating and touching vital organs such as the heart. While there will be severe burn damage at higher voltages, it is normally not fatal.

It is sometimes suggested that human lethality is most common with alternating current at 100–250 volts; however, death has occurred outside this range, with supplies as low as 32 volts and supplies at over 250 volts frequently causing fatalities. Electrical discharge from lightning tends to travel over the surface of the body causing burns and may cause respiratory arrest.

Skin Resistance
The voltage necessary for electrocution depends on the current through the body and the duration of the current. Using Ohm's law, Voltage = Current × Resistance, we see that the current drawn depends on the resistance of the body. The resistance of our skin varies from person to person and fluctuates between different times of day. In general, dry skin is a poor conductor that may have a resistance of around 100,000 Ω, while broken or wet skin may have a resistance of around 1,000 Ω.

Point of entry
  1. Macroshock: Current across intact skin and through the body. Current from arm to arm, or between an arm and a foot, is likely to traverse the heart, therefore it is much more dangerous than current between a leg and the ground.
  2. Microshock: Direct current path to the heart tissue.


References:
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org
  2. http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/JackHsu.shtml
  3. http://www.grandin.com/humane/elec.stun.html
  4. "Industry Backs IEEE-NFPA Arc Flash Testing Program With Initial Donations Of $1.25 Million". IEEE. 14 July 2006. http://standards.ieee.org/announcements/pr_FINArc.html. Retrieved on 2008-01-01.
  5. "Publication No. 98-131: Worker Deaths by Electrocution". National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/98-131/overview.html. Retrieved on 2008-08-16.
  6. Philippe Morel, "Line Maintenance Reaches New Heights", Transmission & Distribution World, Aug 1, 1999, accessed 2007-06-22
  7. Folliot, Dominigue (1998). "Electricity: Physiological Effects". Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, Fourth Edition. http://www.ilo.org/encyclopedia/?doc&nd=857100207&nh=0. Retrieved on 2006-09-04.
  8. NIOSH (1998) Worker Death by Electrocution Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH Pub. No. 98-131.
  9. "Torture, American style: The surprising force behind torture: democracies". Boston Globe. 2007-12-16. http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2007/12/16/torture_american_style/. Retrieved on 2008-01-01.
  10. Russian Federation Preliminary briefing to the UN Committee against Torture 1 April 2006, statement by Amnesty International
  11. "Serial killer's death sentence upheld". Asahi Shimbun. 2007-09-27. http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200709270058.html. Retrieved on 21 March 2008.
  12. Death Penalty Information Center